The term “class panic" derived from C. Right Mills “status panic” has been used by H. A. Tanhaei since 1988 to explain the internal fears, panic and anxiety within class character as either a historical or a social heritage. It is used for an exact explanation of the nature of class structure in heterostructure societies to show one of the most gruesome and appalling aspects of despotism in oriental societies. Class conflict, ethnic bases as well as ideological roots of the dominant class are the elements that find the least linkage to the suppressed class in heterostructure societies. In Iranian hetero-structure society, thus the layers of suppressed class even some of the layers of the upper class are all the time under physical or psychological pressures, anxiety of inspection and torture. The continuation of the negative dialectic of class conflict reinforces a class panic from dominating agents such as the political system, the police, militia forces, the military layers of the dominant class, the ideological and political militias over the ordinary people of the dominated class. In such a situation the epistemological states of different layers are influenced by the dominated class toward an epistemological state of the dominant class as suppressed consciousness. They also involve in a sort of fatigue, helplessness and prostration in their interactions and all of these states deposit in their characters. The structure of the people’s class character gradually gets inactive, faint-hearted and cowardly, anxious, sad and disappointed. In this way class panic influences the ethics as well as the class character of the people, which is closely related to the concept of “culture of poverty”.
Sources
تنهایی، ۱۳۷۳، جامعه‌شناسی در ادیان، یزد: بهاباد.
تنهایی، ۱۳۷۴، درآمدی بر مکاتب و نظریه‌های جامعه‌شناسی، مشهد: مرندیز.
تنهایی، ۱۳۷۸، جامعه‌شناسی تاریخی اسلام، تهران: مرندیز و روزگار.
تنهایی، ۱۳۸۲، جامعه‌شناسی دینی/فلسفی در غرب باستان، تهران: بهمن‌برنا.
تنهایی، ۱۳۹۰، جامعه‌شناسی دینی در شرق باستان، تهران: بهمن‌برنا.
CLASS PANIC
The term “class panic" derived from C. Right Mills “status panic” has been used by H. A. Tanhaei since 1988 to explain the internal fears, panic and anxiety within class character as either a historical or a social heritage. It is used for an exact explanation of the nature of class structure in heterostructure societies to show one of the most gruesome and appalling aspects of despotism in oriental societies. Class conflict, ethnic bases as well as ideological roots of the dominant class are the elements that find the least linkage to the suppressed class in heterostructure societies. In Iranian hetero-structure society, thus the layers of suppressed class even some of the layers of the upper class are all the time under physical or psychological pressures, anxiety of inspection and torture. The continuation of the negative dialectic of class conflict reinforces a class panic from dominating agents such as the political system, the police, militia forces, the military layers of the dominant class, the ideological and political militias over the ordinary people of the dominated class. In such a situation the epistemological states of different layers are influenced by the dominated class toward an epistemological state of the dominant class as suppressed consciousness. They also involve in a sort of fatigue, helplessness and prostration in their interactions and all of these states deposit in their characters. The structure of the people’s class character gradually gets inactive, faint-hearted and cowardly, anxious, sad and disappointed. In this way class panic influences the ethics as well as the class character of the people, which is closely related to the concept of “culture of poverty”.
Sources
تنهایی، ۱۳۷۳، جامعه‌شناسی در ادیان، یزد: بهاباد.
تنهایی، ۱۳۷۴، درآمدی بر مکاتب و نظریه‌های جامعه‌شناسی، مشهد: مرندیز.
تنهایی، ۱۳۷۸، جامعه‌شناسی تاریخی اسلام، تهران: مرندیز و روزگار.
تنهایی، ۱۳۸۲، جامعه‌شناسی دینی/فلسفی در غرب باستان، تهران: بهمن‌برنا.
تنهایی، ۱۳۹۰، جامعه‌شناسی دینی در شرق باستان، تهران: بهمن‌برنا.
تنهایی، ۱۴۰۰، دستگاه نظری تفسیری پرگمتیستی، تهران: اندیشه احسان